peer review1 20706

5 points

• Technically perfect

• Follows the classical argument

• Displays an interesting and unique perspective on a highly specialized topic

• Thought provoking and captivating

• Clearly the product of extensive drafting and research

4 points

• Technically perfect

• Follows the classical argument

• Displays a unique perspective on a highly specialized topic

• Clearly the product of thorough drafting and research

3 points

• Follows the classical argument

• Displays a unique perspective on a highly specialized topic

• Some evidence of drafting and research

2 points

• Displays a unique perspective on a highly specialized topic

0 points

• Incomplete or inadequate

Grade
According to the rubric above, what grade would you give this essay? Why?
4grades. it followed the form of classical argument well and the the topic is quite unigue
How does this essay need to improve to get a better grade?
The ideas are not actually really quoted.

Thesis
What is the thesis?
Civic Participation in Criminal Trials should exist.

Is the thesis clear and debatable?
yes

If you (The reviewer) wrote this essay, how would you have written the thesis?
Clivic Participation in Criminal Trials should not exist

Any other thoughts?
No she did well
Classical Argument

Can you easily identify the 5 parts of the classical argument? If no, what parts are missing?
It was actually hard to separate the whole essay into 5parts but i could see what she was trying to say

Does the introduction catch your attention? Does it comfortably lead to the thesis?
YEs, she defined the two main trials that are actually used.

Does the narration give all the necessary background information to understand the topic?
yesDoes the confirmation adequately support the thesis?

yesDoes the refutation and concession address a realistic counterpoint? Does it adequately dispute the counterpoint, or respond in a reasonable manner?
yes
Does the conclusion summarize the article and address the larger significance of the thesis?
yes
What suggestions do you have for improving the classical argument structure?
yes
Persuasion
When you started reading the essay, did you agree or disagree with the thesis?
.yes

When you finished the essay, did you agree or disagree with the thesis?
yes

If your mind changed, why? What parts of the essay were persuasive?
no i didn't changed my mind.How could the author enhance the persuasive parts of their essay?
she was really good at giving her final thoughts with confirmation

Research
Is the author using research effectively?
yes

Is the research from appropriate sources?
yes
Are the sources obvious?
yes

Are the pieces of evidence relevant to the thesis or essay?
yes

Are there any parts of the essay that need evidence to support the claims?
.yes